Connect with us

News

Former One Life to Live Co-Head Writer Sam Hall Sues ABC Over Royalties!

By Michael Fairman

Published

13 years ago

on

Courtesy/TOLN

The former co-head writer of One Life to Live Sam Hall is suing ABC for what he claims are royalties owed when the iconic soap opera transitioned to the web via Hulu and iTunes, and was broadcast during the “Summer Fling With The Soaps” summer soap-block of the revival of the seriesĀ  on OWN via Prospect Park, who licensed the rights to both programs from Disney/ABC in 2011.

Hall served as a co-head writer of the soap opera in the mid-1980s, filed a lawsuit in New York state court.Ā  According to the complaint, ABC made a deal in 1984 with Wildercliff, Ltd. for Hall’s writing services. The agreement is said to have entitled Hall to a weekly royalty “as long as the One Life to Live series is broadcast.”

The Hollywood Reporter details,Ā  “A copy of the agreement was included as an exhibit in the lawsuit. The royalty payment was $1,000 per week, and it’s not spelled out whether “broadcast” is restricted to network television. Hall says he got those weekly royalties until Jan. 13, 2012, when the series ended on ABC.Ā  Now, Hall is stepping up to stake a claim that his old contract entitles him to royalties from that period.

“Each week during which such exhibitions by each authorized entity occurred Hall was entitled to be paid the weekly royalties,” says the complaint. “Despite due demand, Hall has not been paid any of the weekly royalties to which he is entitled for the exhibition of the series by Prospect Park Productions, iTunes, Hulu and OWN, which total in excess of $50,000.”Ā Ā Ā  ABC could not be reached for comment.

So what do you think of the latest legal problems involving One Life to Live?Ā  Let us know!

Related Topics:
Click to comment

0 Comments
oldest
newest

Out of control!

Reply

OWN is a network and networks broadcast. Sounds like ABC needs to pull out the checkbook and pay up. Happy to see someone light a little fire under them and stand up for themselves! Too bad ABC can’t be sued for bad decision-making, as in the decision to axe a couple of great soaps. They’d be bankrupt if that could be done…

Reply

“Too bad ABC canā€™t be sued for bad decision-making….” I’ll drink to that.

Reply

Me too!

Reply

and so will I.

Reply

There are potentially two areas were ABC could be liable for what they did to AMC/OLTL. Disney/ABC owns many stations which are licensed by the FCC and so they are supposed to operate “in the public interest.” A case could be made that they put profits ahead of the viewer’s interests. Disney is a publicly traded stockholder owned corporation and so are regulated by the SEC. A case might be made that they did not operate in the shareholders best interest by scrapping potentially profitable properties with AMC/OLTL. I am a bit surprised a fan group hasn’t tried this by now. Just a thought. šŸ˜‰ Let the suing commence.

(Working late and bored)

Reply

Legally in the entertainment business, A Broadcast Network is a network that has affiliate all over the country like the ABC CBS and the newer diginets Like Me TV Antenna TV and Retro TV. Cable is a different thing. Just as ONLINE Viewing is a different thing, they all have their own rules.
The cost for a Cable channel like Familynet to air NEWHART is less then what a Broadcast Network like ME TV would have to pay. That is what ME TV said on their Facebook page.

When Prospect Park first started with the plan to go ONLINE they had to work with the Unions, to lower the cost. based on the fact that it will be airing online and downloaded.

Reply

If this lawsuit prevails, it’s not a good thing as this will be an added expense to any hope whatsoever of these 2 shows EVER finding an online home. This would be the final nail in the coffin.

Reply

I remember seeing the name Sam Hall in the closing credits. THIRTY FREAKING YEARS AGO!!!!! What is wrong with some people that they would rather sue than work for a living???

Reply

Royalties are a standard part of contracts for creative services; in the case of soaps, they recognize that creative contributions have value well beyond the immediate need they fill. (I don’t know if it’s still the case, but I know that at least as recently as the early 2000s, headwriters on P&G soaps got royalties so long as any character they created while they were headwriter was still part of the show.) Soap creators get royalties so long as the soap they create is on the air; I don’t see anything wrong with headwriters negotiating similar provisions. (Whether $1,000 a week forever is reasonable is an open question and debatable, of course, but apparently somebody thought so at the time the contract was negotiated, or he wouldn’t have gotten it, and if that’s what the contract says, they should pay up.) Another thing to keep in mind: in the mid-1980s, soaps were still enormously profitable for the networks–they even supported nighttime television. $1,000 a week for life might not have been an unreasonable cut to expect, though of course it seems outrageous by today’s standards, with soaps so much less profitable.

I don’t think it has as much to do with laziness as with recognition that there was no job security and that soap writers got hired and fired, often on what amounted to whims. That was true in the 1980s and is equally true or more so today. I doubt anybody is getting the kind of contract clause any more that’s being discussed here, but I would not hold it against them if they did. To me, it’s not all that different from a pension, in a field with no job security and no retirement plan.

Reply

$1,000 dollars a week for one person is $52,000 dollars a year for 1 person not even involved in the show anymore. Though ABC did agree to that contract so you get what you pay for, but it’s no wonder it costs over $50 Million a year to produce 1 soap

Reply

gees… perhaps all of OLTL fans could sue ABC for breaking our hearts and cancelling our beloved show…

just as absurd !

Reply

I hope everyone sues ABC. In fact maybe all the fans of AMC and OLTL could have a class action lawsuit based on our pain and suffering! Maybe we could all get disability. I know I have suffered and am not able to cope with life as well as I used to! As always, boo to all things ABCDISNEY!

Reply

I dont think he’ll win…technically speaking Prospect Park was now responsible for airing the show on OWN not ABC regardless if ABC still owned the series, so Sam Hall it seems could only sue if ABC was airing the show which they are not so it seems the contract would no longer be valid unless it includes another co. airing the show on a network other than ABC…i know nothing about these things so my comments probably dont matter…Sam Hall used to write for another soap Dark Shadows and his late wife Grayson Hall appeared on it as Dr. Julia Hoffman who attempted to cure Barnabas Collins of his vampirisim and fell in love with him…she also played other characters on the show during various time travels storylines and also appeared on OLTL with Nancy Barret and the late Anthony George who also appeared with her on Dark Shadows!

Reply

This royalty stuff is nonsense. You do a job, you get paid for it. Why should you continue to be paid for that work years later?

Reply

Because it’s the law!! Actors still get paid residuals for film and TV work done years ago, and so do writers. In this case the deal Mr. Hall struck with ABC thirty years ago gave him residuals even after he left the show. Let’s say if you were a recording artist and had a hit record back in the 60s, and you discovered that you weren’t getting royalties in 2014 despite that recording being used in commercials, movie soundtracks and the like, you’d demand the back royalties owed you by the record company. You could file suit against the current owners of the record company and win in court. This happens ALL the time. Just ask performers like Martha Reeves, Ronnie Spector, and Tommy James- all of who sued and won back their overdue royalties. Thanks to unions like AFTRA/SAG and in Mr. Hall’s case, The Writer’s Guild of America, laws were created to protect artists so they could get their share of corporate profits. Jonboy, would YOU like to be ripped off by a major corporation when you know that under the law you have a right to earn money for your past work as it is still making money? That’s the case here. Mr. Hall is well within his rights.

Reply

I understand what you’re saying within the entertainment business but I don’t “get” it logically. If I do a job for my company, lets say I create a new spreadsheet, should I get paid every time someone uses it? I’ve already been paid for doing the job by my company. ABC, or whoever, paid Hall when he wrote the show. Why should he, or anyone else, be paid again and again for doing something they were already paid for?

Reply

Lawsuits are a bane to our existence,

Yet another frivolous reason to keep OLTL off the air.

30 years – come on….but are there other deals like this ?

maybe this is why ABC shut down their soaps, because of bad deals made in the eighties.

Bring back OLTL!

Reply

You’d be surprised. When Audrey Meadows signed on to play Alice Kramden in “The Honeymooners”, she had a very smart manager who made sure that there was a clause that she would get residuals ‘in perpetuity’- that is, AS LONG AS SHE LIVED! Who knew back then that the show would be on the air nonstop over the decades? Ms. Meadows got residual checks from that show for decades! Before the laws were changed in the 80s, there were limits as to the years a performer could get residuals from old TV shows.

Reply

$1,000 dollars a week. That is the reason why we don’t see Soaps repeated on the Subchannels like ME TV . The cost for the Royalities for music and writers, and actors etc which is much higher for a Broadcast Network then it is for Cable. Plus the fact that Drama’s especially serialized ones don’t repeat that well.

Reply

ABC obviously didn’t read the fine print in their own contacts with Mr. Hall and with Prospect Park! This could set a big precedent in regards to online materials and royalties from such programming. I read somewhere that some soap writers will get residuals for years to come as long as characters they created stay on the show. That’s one reason why when a soap changes writers, some writers are more than happy to get rid of some old characters and add some of their own. Considering that Mr. Hall was the head writer at OLTL in its most popular era (mid 70s- mid-80s), he was responsible for a great deal of long-running characters and stories on the show. He created the Buchanans, Tina, Renee, Cassie and others that stayed on for years. It seems like ABC gave him carte blanche with that 1984 contract, and the fact that he got money for years afterwards seems to be in his favor. ABC leased the show (along with characters created by Sam Hall like Clint and Bo Buchanan) to Prospect Park, and he may just have a case against ABC. It reminds me of when Walt Disney signed Peggy Lee to write and records songs for “Lady & the Tramp” in the 1950s. There was a clause in the contract guaranteeing Ms. Lee royalties for all future transcriptions. When the film made it to home video in the 1980s, she sued Disney for royalties, as she argued that the home videos were transcriptions under her 1954 deal. She wound up winning over $2 million in court from Disney! And now that Disney owns ABC, it’s deja vu all over again, only this time it’s a writer regarding one of their shows!

Reply

When I think of royalties I think of someone getting paid for their past creative work. Usually residuals/royalties are for the rebroadcast of their show (syndication) – regardless of what network/channel carried it. So as a writer of a soap, when you stop working for that soap – it does not get rebroadcast again (usually) and there would be no royalties. IF it were for characters said writer created ‘as long as they were on the canvas’, then I understand it.
If that truly is the case, then it looks like abc/d may have to pay up.

Reply

I’m sure someone will point out that when the contract was made in 1984 – that broadcast meant TV or radio. There was no video on the web, and OWN station isn’t ABC nor did ABC allow OWN to play these new web shows on the OWN station… that would be Prospect.

as far as what someone’s contract said about royalities, wouldn’t all other writers have had similar statements in their contracts as well?

Reply

ABC-TV made the worst decision in television History when they cancelled the beloved ALL MY CHILDREN as well as OLTL ~ whatever bad Karma comes their way now is much deserved.
Although I wasn’t overly thrilled with the shows as “On-line” inceptions, I was grateful to see some of the characters and some familiar faces again. Now, who knows if these shows will ever see the light of day again ~ seems doubtful, but one never knows….if the Execs at ABC had half a brain they would combine both shows…

Reply

The Hall deal was with ABC and any new deal would be with PP. Most royalty contracts are when the characters the head writer creates is still on the show. He Created Clint and Bo, so it makes since that he has the deal. OWN probly just paid flat licence fee to re-broadcast.

Reply

The only way that he might get any more money is because Soapnet I think was carrying reruns of One Life to Live until that station went off the air.

Reply

ABC pay MR.Hall his money

Reply

News

‘The Bold and the Beautiful’s’ Jacqueline MacInnes Wood Delivers the ‘Power Performance of the Week’

Published

4 hours ago

on

August 24, 2026

By

Jacqueline MacInnes Wood

Last week, The Bold and the Beautiful gave three-time Lead Actress Daytime Emmy winner, Jacqueline MacInnes Wood, the material to go for a fourth in 2027. In an emotional scenes, Wood showcased her sadness, feeling of betrayal and abandoned by her husband, Finn, to her good friend and co-worker, Carter Walton (Lawrence Saint-Victor).

But here’s the catch; Wood, as well as Saint-Victor, played the scenes completely drunk. First, Steffy drinks herself silly on the plane home from Monaco after finding out Finn’s (Tanner Novlan) mother, Sheila (Kimberlin Brown) who she has PTSD about with good reason, boarded the plane with him to Europe and kept it a secret. Steffy had already thrown her ring at her husband and storm trooped to the airport after seeing momma Carter in Monaco.

Later, Steffy somehow stumbles into the Forrester Creations CEO office, and suddenly Carter also shows up. He is also schnokereed from knocking back one after the other over Daphne (Murielle Hilaire) walking out on him.

Photo: JPI

Suddenly, Steffy opens up her heart to Carter, ā€œI need to be safe, so itā€™s over. Weā€™re over,” speaking about her marriage to Finn. She says, ā€œI keep replaying this moment. There was this shift. I saw it. I asked him if he was OK. Then, I realized what he was looking at ….Sheila. She was right there. And my husband wasnā€™t going to protect meā€¦ he wasnā€™t going to be there for me.ā€

Steffy is full on in upset-mode, that in that moment she put her faith in Finn’s commitment to her, he didn’t come through with “actions”, and that his word meant nothing. Carter winds up sitting next to Steffy on the desk of the office, blindsided by each of their partners.

Suddenly, Steffy becomes hysterical, and lets out all of her rage and Carter takes her in his arms and says “I got you.”Ā  Then, in the pick-up of the next morning, it appeared as if Carter and Steffy had sex together and passed out.

When Steffy came to she freaked out. Realizing, there wer texts from Finn trying to reach her, she wasn’t home for her kids, and she panicked and had to get out of there. When Carter tried to talk to her, she couldn’t in that moment, feeling so guilt-ridden and ashamed for her betraying her marriage like this, when she truly loves Finn.

Photo: JPI

Once she gets back home as a disheveled mess, she runs into her mother, Taylor (Rebecca Budig), before Finn arrives and lays it on thick and begs for forgiveness. Trying to recover from her hangover, her night with Carter and what all went down, as Finn talks, everything is confusing for Steffy, as she cries. She wants to tell her husband what she did and confess. But will she?

By the end of last week, Carter is begging Steffy to keep her mouth shut about their booze-filled night together, but she cries that lying to her husband and it is eating her up. Carter tells Steffy the truth of their night together can never come out for so many reasons; least of all his relationship with her father, Ridge (Thorsten Kaye) and Daphne. Will Steffy eventually crumble and spill the beans or stay quiet? Stay tuned!

Throughout all the very soapy scenarios, we have to say, we enjoyed Wood’s performances as it showed a more vulnerable, letting her guard down from the often holier-than- thou Steffy Forrester. We also think its material taking out of context that would be just right for many Emmy voters next year. So with all that said, Michael Fairman TV gives the Power Performance of the Week to B&B’s Jacqueline MacInnes Wood.

So, do you agree with our pick as Jacqueline MacInnes Wood as the Power Performance of the Week? Did you think she delivered in the scenes from the time Steffy left her husband in Monaco, through the drunken binge with Carter, to back home and being confronted with Finn wanting her to take him back? Let us know in the comment section below.

Continue Reading

General Hospital

‘General Hospital’s’ Dominic Zamprogna Shares He Was ‘Happy to Hear’ of The Triangle Storyline Developing Between Dante/Elizabeth/Ric

Published

19 hours ago

on

August 23, 2026

By

Dominic Zamprogna

General Hospital’s Dominic Zamprogna (Dante Falconeri) opened up about the burgeoning love triangle forming between his Port Charles alter-go, Elizabeth Webber (Rebecca Herbst) and Ric Lansing (Rick Hearst) after recently aired scenes, plus his hopes for the future of a Dante and Liz pairing, during his appearance on the Sunday, April 23 edition of the That’s Awesome podcast with Steve Burton (Jason Morgan) and Bradford Anderson (Spinelli).

On last week’s episodes of GH, Ric has made the decision that he wanted to propose to his ex-wife, only when he showed up at Elizabeth’s front door, he misread the scenario he walked in with Liz tending to Dante’s injured leg from the softball game. From there, the legal eagle’s jealous streak is reemerging which may cause him to act out and do something unforgivable, or will he take the high road? Stay tuned.

Speaking with Steve Burton and Bradford Anderson about where Elizabeth stands in the annals of the long-running soap, Zamprogna said, “She’s up there with Steve and Maurice (Maurice Benard) as one of the most legacy-filled people on the show.”

Courtesy/ABC

HOW DANTE AND ELIZABETH CAME ABOUT

Dominic jokes it’s a far cry for where Dante and Elizabeth previously, recalling, “We had some scenes together years ago and we were both laughing. Becky’s like, ‘Well, I guess we’re not going be paired up anytime soon.’ I remember we laughed immediately after they yelled ‘cut,”‘and said to each other, ‘Well, so much for that!'”

Fast-forward to early 2025 and as Zamprogna remembered it, “Elizabeth Korte (co-head writer, GH) came up to me at the General Hospital Christmas party, and I think it was a year and a half ago and she said, ‘We’re going to have you in scenes with Elizabeth,’ My internal monologue is going, ‘I’m not with Lulu (Alexa Havins) anymore and Sam’s (Kelly Monaco) gone, so maybe they want to see if this works.’ I didn’t want to get scenes with Becky and try to find the chemistry. I just wanted to play whatever honestly was written and came across for both of us and hope it was what people liked, and I don’t know if it is … or not.”

Knowing how beloved Elizabeth is to the GH faithfuls, Zamprogna added, “She got a big fan base with Ric … and a big fan base with with Jason … and you know, you’re going to piss somebody off. But, didn’t Ric drug Elizabeth and put Carly in a panic room?”

Dom and Liz

Photo: ABC

DANTE AND ELIZABETH PAIRING COULD STIR UP STORY FOR OTHERS IN PORT CHARLES

In closing, Dominic felt that the wide-reaching tentacles of a Dante and Elizabeth relationship is something he is 100% down for. “The triangle thing; I was happy to hear it was with Ric and her, because I felt it’s important to have her the top of it as opposed to Dante, Lulu and Elizabeth.”

Zamprogna added, “When you get into relationships on a soap, things seem to fizzle out a little bit, The buildup is what’s the fun part, and the getting to know each other, and the people who are affected by this coming together. When with this case it’s going to affect: Ric, Sonny, Lulu. There’s so much more story here. To me, it’s going to be a fun story to play.”

You can check out Dominic’s visit to That’s Awesome with Steve and Bradford below.

Now weigh-in: Are you rooting for Dante and Liz, or Dante and Ric at this juncture of the story, or neither guyĀ  for Elizabeth? Let us know your thoughts and picks via the comment section.

Continue Reading

Beyond the Gates

‘Beyond the Gates’ Star Mike Manning Lands Role in Indie Horror Feature ‘Deify’

Published

3 days ago

on

August 21, 2026

By

Mike Manning

While Smitty tries to hold the fort down in his marriage to congressman Martin Richardson (Brandon Claybon)Ā  and their two teenaged children, Samantha (Najah Jackson) and Tyrell (Jaden Lucas Miller) on Beyond the Gates, Emmy-winner Mike Manning has also landed another feature film role.

According to Deadline, Manning has joined the cast of Deify with 6 other new cast members for the indie psychological horror film starring Neal McDonough and Skeet Ulrich, which was previously announced last week.

Joining Manning as the latest cast addition are: Dennis Haysbert, Ashley Greene, Ā Casey Harnett, Kirk Avecdo, Anji White, anf Nicholas Chimera whoā€™s directing the pic also has a part in the film.

WHAT’S THE STORY OF DEIFY?

Taking to his Instagram with the news of his casting, Manning shared, “A movie about a cult? What could possibly go wrong? Come for the enlightenment. Stay because they wonā€™t let you leave. DEIFY is comingā€¦”

The movie is currently shooting in Chicago and in story, “a cult leader is put on trial after causing his devoted followers to be burned alive. The film is inspired in part by events surrounding the 1993 Waco, Texas, standoff between members of the Branch Davidians church and the Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms and Explosives, one of the largest civilian firefights ever recorded on American soil.”

MIKE MANNING IS A DAYTIME EMMY NOMINEE

In addition, the multi-talented Manning is a producer on the feature. Previously, Mike was nominated last month in the Outstanding Supporting Actor in a Drama Series for the upcoming 53rd annual Daytime Emmy Awards. He previously won an Emmy for his role on The Bay and for being a producer on the digital drama.

Mike’s previous credits include the role of Charlie Dale on Days of Our Lives and the Manny on This Is Us, plus various primetime and screen credits.

So intrigued to find what role Mike will play in the upcoming horror/cult film, Deify? Enjoying him as Smitty on Beyond the Gates? Share your thoughts via the comment section below.

Continue Reading

Video Du Jour

Jonathan Bennett joins the cast of GH as Joe Fitzpatrick. Catch the latest promo! Leave a comment.Leave A Comment

Recent Comments

Power Performance

Heather

Heather Tom

The Bold and the Beautiful

Airdate: 7-24-2026

Popular

0
Would love your thoughts, please comment.x
()
x