Connect with us

All My Children

Former ABC exec, writer Sara Saedi, on what ABC did & didn't do to save their soaps!

Photo Credit: JPI Studios

Photo Credit: JPI Studios

In a very interesting post at, Sara Saedi, the writer of the very the clever, What-If crossover series that aired on and, and formerly a creative executive at ABC Daytime, offered her thoughts on the last several history making days in the world of soaps, which saw the demise of All My Children and One Life to Live as handed down by ABC Daytime President, Brian Frons.

In her new blog, Saedi elaborates at all the things she says ABC tried for their soaps, and then looked at what the network was up against, or, did not do to save their soaps.  Here are some excerpts!

Saedi commented in her blog post, “I believe the network and specifically Brian Frons (President of ABC Daytime) have gotten a bum rap these last few days. In the time I was at ABC, we tried EVERYTHING to save the soaps and increase the ratings. We brought back legacy characters, we brought in younger characters in hopes of raising our teen and 18-34 demo, we cut costs, we executed high concept action driven storylines, we executed high romance emotionally driven storylines, we started a cable network so women could watch their soaps at night, we produced webisodes, we used CGI to raise production value, we did endless research to figure out what was working for viewers and what wasn’t, we went back to focusing on social issues, we went HD, we traveled all around the country so soap stars could meet their fans.We hired Latino actors to attract the telenovella viewers, we went more salacious in our narratives, we went more true to life in our narratives, we went multi-platform, we did shorter close ended story arcs, we sat in rooms for hours with writers and talked in great depth about every single character on each show and what their objectives were, we took risks, we played it safe, we sold an All My Children perfume in Wal-Mart, we published books “written by” our fictional characters, we killed off beloved characters, we brought back beloved characters from the dead, we even brought a movie star on General Hospital…and the ratings still didn’t go up.”

“Now, here are the things us execs did not do to save the soaps when I worked there: we didn’t dispose of computers and additional TV sets in people’s homes to get families back to one TV per household. (Teens and kids don’t watch soaps with their moms anymore, because they don’t have to— they have their own TVs in their rooms or computers to keep them company.) We also didn’t try to get women out of the work force and back into their homes to watch TV during the day. We didn’t confiscate every single DVR in every single house and destroy it. We didn’t put an end to cable TV and the 200+ channels soaps compete with, we didn’t hold Telemundo and Univision hostage and forbid them from airing telenovellas, we didn’t outlaw Reality TV or primetime shows that ripped off our format, and we didn’t create a time machine to take us back to the heyday of soaps in the 1980s. It’s been thirty years since the heyday, which means a lot of time for viewer fatigue. I love Modern Family, but if someone asked me if I wanted to watch it everyday for the next thirty years, I’d probably pass. It wasn’t the network that killed the soaps. It was the progression of time, technology, and competition.”

What do you think of Saedi’s remarks and commentary? Let us know!

0 0 vote
Article Rating
Click to comment
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
April 19, 2011 12:26 am

I actually agree with everything that she said.

April 19, 2011 3:26 pm
Reply to  Stephanie

Me too!

It seems like the writers who had been there for too long and had heads that were too big, just wouldn’t let the younger generation offer ideas that would suit a new generation of soap fans.

April 19, 2011 12:29 am

WOW! That last paragraph was very condescending and insulting! I don’t believe anything this woman says. She sounds like a Frons apologist, and I don’t believe they’ve tried everything. I also believe that Frons had no passion for soaps and he seemed to have micro-managed them way too much. Frons seems like a jerk and I think he is solely responsible for wrecking these beloved soaps.

April 19, 2011 5:30 am
Reply to  Vicki

Agreed. Extremely condescending. Yes, we now live in a world of technology and what we liked in the 80’s isn’t necessarily what we like now. Except- a lot of those fans from the 80’s and earlier, still watch soaps. We may have to DVR them- so, unless you’re footing my rent, car payment, food, and insurance, that’s not going to change- but the viewers are there. The problem is that with this technological progression no one thought about updating the Nielson ratings, or creating a new system that actually counts ALL viewers. And exactly who did you poll that said reality tv was the way to win viewers. BIG MISTAKE, ABC. Very big loss of viewers mistake.

April 22, 2011 2:24 pm
Reply to  Bren

I agree with you Bren 100%

April 19, 2011 12:49 pm
Reply to  Vicki

Condescending is right. But that is nothing new. That is the attitude soap fans and the soap casts have been getting for years under the Frons regime. I didn’t see her mention about how they really listened to fans because they could have spared themselves all the smoke and mirrors and done things of more substance had they listened to their soap fans. I didn’t see any mention of them leaving the creative side the hell alone so they could write character-driven stories since they know when it comes to stories that audiences identify more with characters than they do with CGI effects and movie stars.

And let’s get the facts straight too…especially regarding Soapnet. Soapnet was started before there was a Brian Frons at ABC. That channel did not come to be because of him. Please. The fact is that once he became the head of Soapnet then the network quickly became less and less about soaps. Just like in many ways Froms from the very start tried to make the soaps less and less about soaps. I am really tired of ABC peeing on all of us daytime soap fans and then telling us it is raining. They don’t want us, they don’t care about us. They think we are old and have no spendable income. But they are the ones who need to go because they are telling tall tales to their sponsors and advertisers.

April 19, 2011 12:54 am

Well obviously something worked or OLTL wouldn’t have moved up to third in the ratings or be the only soap to have gained viewers compared to last year. The performances have been incredible; the storylines strong. She is probably afraid to say anything against Frons, out of fear for her own financial self-interest, like everyone else who works in television.

Isn’t the real explanation more about money and corporate/shareholder interests? Disney/ABC chooses to produce reality programming over soaps, because even if there are fewer viewers, their revenue will increase by a wider margin.

April 19, 2011 1:02 am

I wonder how much ABC and Brian Frons paid her to write that blog?

No matter. We can play ABC’s games. We are going to hit them where it hurts, in THEIR pocketbooks with OUR pocketbooks.

Fans have already banded together to let ABC’s sponsor know we will be boycotting The Chew and The Revolution AND the products of any business that sponsors those shows. We are going to freeze them out.

Every major General Hospital fan site is actively involved too.

April 19, 2011 1:03 am

I don’t believe that Brian Frons has gotten a bum wrap in the last few days. He’s had a black eye on him for a while now. But the network has refused to do anything about it despite the fact that fans are rallying for change. Frons favors certain actors over others, and centers stories heavily around them. When fans are forced to watch the same characters every day over and over, and sometimes with little to no progress being made for months at a time, fans get bored. Stories can be expedited, but at what cost? Good writing. Plot points are missed. A well paced, thought out story with good continuity and no history re-writes would be nice. Bringing back legacy characters? Fantastic. But it’d be nice if they were brought back for more than just a ratings grab. Put some thought into the stories to bring them back into the fold in a natural way. Genie Francis’ short term return when Laura went off to Paris for treatment? Genie herself said that she felt it more about ratings, than it was actually about the character and giving the fans what they had been wanting. Cutting costs? Really? How is going to HD cutting costs? From what I understand, that’s pretty damn expensive. And if ABC/Disney wanted out of the soap market, why would they invest money hand over fist for shows that weren’t turn profits anymore (or were beginning to lose momentum)? CGI costs a lot of money. And quite frankly, I wouldn’t miss it. It looks really cheesy, and you can tell it’s not real. At least in the movies, it looks good (yes they have bigger budgets). Why waste the money when a set can be rocked back and forth to simulate an accident, then just have the next scene with debris scattered all around…why are there fresh flowers in nearly every shot? Endless research? I don’t think so. How could someone have done endless research to find out what was working for fans, and what wasn’t? All one has to do is look at message boards on or or look at twitter feeds to find out….It’s impossible to keep all fans happy at all times, but if there were more equality between actors/characters screentime, storylines to go around, less re-written history to fit a new vision and an actual DECENT storyline, fans would be flocking home after work in droves to see their shows… Sure James Franco has don’t a couple of stints on GH. But how much did that cost the show? Fans that came with James to see his work probably didn’t stick around because the stories were so focused on him, and the other characters were sacrificed to prop him up that those viewers didn’t form an emotional attachment on any level to them – so why come back after James left?? Vanessa Marcil came back. Lots of advertising dollars went to her return. Again, fantastic. Love her. But she… Read more »

April 19, 2011 2:03 pm
Reply to  Megan

Oh I love your post! Love it! They didn’t do enough to help their soaps. One only has to look at the treatment GH gets as compared to OLTL. The network promoted Vanessa Marcil returning day in & day out to point of nausea. At the SAME time VMG was returning a true daytime Diva was making her return on OLTL Kim Zimmer. Where was Kim’s promotions? Yeah…. not so much there. ABC lies, they lie & it makes me ill!

April 28, 2011 3:44 pm
Reply to  Megan

You have great ideas. I especially like the on-air product placement. That would really help advertisers in this age of DVR as long as it is done subtly so as not to interfere in the story. It could actually be quite interesting if done right. You should work for ABC. Then maybe they would have used some of your ideas and we would still have our shows.

April 19, 2011 1:49 am

What they didn`t do is listen to the fans!!!Yes they brought in movies stars (she s talking about Franco)that we didn `t care about!!They brought in newbies (younger) that we didn`t care about! They started story s than left them hanging.They started loves and dropped them.They killed off key familes ,and long time actors that we came to love with no regard for the fans.They spent money on these new people and high priced actors that brought NOTHING to the storys.the block taping at GH is the worse thing they have done.GH stopped using people we cared about yes so it got boring .WE TOLD THEM THAT DID THEY LISTEN NOOOOOOO.

April 19, 2011 2:24 am

Umm excuse me what legacy characters did GH bring back? Brenda was the only one I can think of and she got shoved in a stupid contrived side story with Dante. Is this woman for real? OLTL and AMC did do some of those things but GH NONE of them. In fact they violated EVERY single one of the “How to write a good soap and not piss your audience off” rules..EVERY one of them. They sacked GV and brought back JJ and then completely whitewashed all of LL2 history withouth JJ. WHY? Because he can’t act or handle the crap that was doled out to GV? ABC in the last 2 or 3 years actually since the writers strike has screwed the audience over every minute of every hour during the daytime schedule. Bringing on lifestyles shows that we can find anywhere else is NOT going to win back loyalty and viewers.

April 19, 2011 3:26 pm
Reply to  Anne

I’m not sure I read that right, but did you just imply that Jonathan Jackson can’t act???

April 25, 2011 4:15 pm
Reply to  Jamie

OK, I was not happy with GV being canned (or the implication that he was JJ’s placeholder or a bad actor), but JJ is without a doubt a talented actor and they have held up quite a bit of the GV-era LL2 story.

April 29, 2011 5:31 pm
Reply to  Anne

I was with you until you said that JJ cannot act.

April 19, 2011 3:06 am

Really they did everything, they didn’t listen to any of the fans on their own message boards. So you brought a movie star to a soap. James Franco was horrible and was USING GH for his own agenda. A LOT of GH fans complained about this taking away from their core characters. We asked for more respect for the history of GH, they killed AJ, Justice, Lila, Alan, and Emily. Almost all members of a legacy family. Its mob central all the time, even though the fans have been complaining about the Sonny and Jason show for years now. The fans have been asking for LOVE IN THE AFTERNOON, not the poor mans Godfather. The fans have been asking for use of the entire ensemble cast, yet Jake Webber Spencer died without ever knowing his “real” grandmother, or Great grandfather (imagine the possibilities if Edward knew) and Josselyn got a new kidney and a new body guard all without ever seeing her grandmother who would’ve brought this story full circle. We have been asking for use of veteran characters, yet the inconsistent SORAS’g of children (Cam was born before Molly) doesn’t let the viewers become invested. and of course lets delve into the LIASON/Jasam war. This could’ve been ratings gold for GH, playing this triangle off for years to come, but what happened instead. Rebecca and Steve have barely shared the screen for a minute at a time in the last 2+ years. Brian Frons did everything alright. He did EVERYTHING to purposely ruin the soaps, and Sara Saedi is a Frons flunkie. You did everything except the one most important thing. GIVE EM WHAT THEY WANT!!!!!!!!!!!

April 19, 2011 3:28 am

i think she is just a spokes person for frons……………………

April 19, 2011 3:31 am

What do I think? I think that when I was a child (I was born in ’85) and felt soaps were a punishment because I DID have my own TV (as did my brother); and we had video games (original Nintendo was the bomb); and we did have a computer (granted it only had 2 games that I can remember); and we had a swingset in the backyard; and we had what we called a gameroom (board games, stuffed animals, movies, toys, a pool table, etc were mostly kept in that one room); and my mother did work (she and my dad have owned their own store since before I was born) that my mother still sat me and my siblings down (when we weren’t in school at 2pm central) in the same room when she watched HER General Hospital until one day it became MY General Hospital too.

April 19, 2011 3:43 am

Warning: LONG! I can only speak of what, in my opinion, tptb did to GH (though I think we can infer that OLTL & AMC weren’t treated better) because that’s my soap. 1)They brought in legacy characters and wrote them OUT of character so that these characters we had once loved were unrecognizable. 2)They brought in young characters that we had NO CONNECTION to because we did NOT see them grow up like we did our favorites (Robin, Elizabeth, Jason, Lucky). 3)They executed THEIR VERSION of high action storylines, but the truth is GH had more action in the ’80s and early ’90s. 4)I don’t recall them ever executing high romance stories, but I guess she could be talking about THEIR version of romance, which usually involves a stripper or some contrived plot points that don’t really amount to romance to viewers. 5)They started a cable network and proceeded to fill it with new programming instead of soaps. 6)They produced a handful of webisodes for Night Shift 2 featuring two characters that no one cared about and barely even knew, and they produced a series of webisodes following Bradford Anderson (Spinelli) that really didn’t have anything to do with any soap at all. I’m sure there were other types of webisodes too, but I don’t recall them and none had to do with the soap itself as far as I know. 7)They used CGI to create special effects when every TRUE soap fan knows that soaps are NOT and have NEVER been about the effects, and ended up looking more foolish than not because they will never be able to compete with movie or even primetime effects due to money and TIME. 8) They did endless research by creating an INSIDERS website and asking a select few questions. I had the privilege of being one of those few, the FIRST time. They, however, did NOT listen or execute anything we told them, or if they did it was, again, THEIR version of what we told them we wanted and NOT, in fact, what we actually said. But for the most part, they ignored what we said and then recreated their site, kicking out ALL of us who had pointed out how they were NOT listening to us, complaining about what was airing, and basically opposing THEIR vision of things. Needless to say, *I* was not invited to their relaunched website. Besides the site, they got research from Focus Groups, which Jackie Z (Bobbie) said are manipulated to reinforce whatever Frons/whoever already planned on doing. Focus Group research is supposedly super secret so we aren’t allowed to know how the questions were worded or even what questions/choices were given, but all anyone would have to do is look at GH Facebook’s current questions to see the bias/spin of those in charge. 9)They focused on social issues like Kristina’s abuse, and ratings went UP so they immediately switched the focus to something else because follow through is not really GH’s strong suit… Read more »

April 29, 2011 5:40 pm
Reply to  liasonbff

Eloquently said, laisonbff! I agree 100%

Jen Bryan
April 19, 2011 4:07 am

No they didn’t listen to the fans. Frons did what he wanted to bottom line. What needs to happen is to look at better ways to view their ratings. I’ve read that 1 Neilson family represents 35,000 viewers… However, I’ve never met one of those families. I’m 32 years old and I’ve never once met a family that was a Neilson family. In this day and age I would work with cable and satellite companies to have viewer data pulled directly from DVRs and cable boxes. I would totally support Directv doing that in my home they have that info anyway. He has done everything he can do to tank the soaps. And Ms whatever your name is Soapnet is not in HD and to me that is a bad business move on their part. I’m about tired of those that are an apologist for Frons. Are these folks going to still be apologizing when he brings down daytime completely? Give me a break!

April 19, 2011 4:31 am

Loved what she said there, and i also agree. Maybe if Frons reads this, he would see that people want our soaps then cheap uninteresting shows.

Jen Snelling
April 19, 2011 4:37 am

Maybe they did all those things while she was at ABC but they gave up on many of those efforts without giving them much time. Airing legacy characters in the past several months has sure helped OLTL and, according to ABC, GH too. They cut costs and OLTL has stayed within their budget. They started a cable network for soaps but never really gave it a good chance to take off and run. Fans love the webisodes but there is much more to good marketing than that (and don’t get me started on things like the “Cramer girl reunion.”) Hiring actors isn’t really enough if you don’t treat the ones you have with integrity. The latest book written by a “fictional character” is actually written by Carolyn Hennesy – not Diane Miller – and it is on the NYTimes Bestseller List. “We even brought a movie star on General Hospital.” Does she even realize how many esteemed “movie stars” have done soaps and might again? Think big. Respect your audience. Honor the history of American legacies. I know I’m not a Hollywood insider or television financial expert but I am one of those disrespected audience members who did write letters that were tossed aside for what were considered better ideas. “It’s been thirty years since the heyday, which means a lot of time for viewer fatigue.” Are you kidding me with this? Think about how many people were tuning in DESPITE all this!

Rosie Peat
April 19, 2011 4:56 am

I have to agree with most of the other comments here that this is a load of crap. I’m not saying that ABC and other networks don’t believe that they tried to save soaps, but they sure didn’t listen to fans, which seems beyond obvious. Ultimately it’s ratings that make or break most shows and if writers, producers, and network/channel executives create a show fans want to watch, they will. Yes, viewing habits are changing, but it’s not the fault of fans that Nielsen and internal ratings research haven’t kept pace with changing viewer habits or technology. If television manufacturers, the federal government, and the aspects of the entertainment industry can come together for the V-Chip, why not create a ratings chip too? Granted, they would have to figure out who was going to collect, store, and report the data and for what purposes, but seems like a relatively easy and needed solution since both prime time and daytime shows are down in viewers and revenue generation. Or in the alternative, why don’t the networks and channels put pressure on Nielsen to come up with a better system?

Rosie Peat
April 19, 2011 5:01 am

Besides, and not to sound too snarky, but Saedi lost credibility for me when I read she was behind what-if webisodes, before I even got to blog excerpts. Some may have enjoyed those, but I couldn’t even make it through the first one and didn’t watch a single one after that even on youtube.

April 19, 2011 5:16 am

They may have tried a lot of things but they did none of them well. James Franco is a great actor and GH managed to make him look stupid. They didn’t give real thought to whether the writers themselves were the issue. ABC has had a fatalist attitude for years about soaps, reluctant to change the core of soap writers who were tired and creatively bankrupt for fear of rocking the boat and failing to recognize the same tired writers were the crux of the problem. They expected soaps to fail and planned accordingly. Now they are surprised by people calling out their efforts as token at best or highlighting their incompetence at their job at worst. Clearly the Peter Principle is alive and well in the TV industry just as elsewhere. Let us hope Frons has risen to his highest level of incompetence but it seems more likely he’ll continue to screw up everything he touches. The Chew? Seriously? Will Red Man be a new sponsor for their “plugs”?

April 19, 2011 6:00 am

I agree with what she is saying in the final paragraph. However, what also needs to change with time and technology is that prehistoric system they call Nielsen. These networks put all their money on a system that no longer can accomodate the growing technology in television viewing. Why does watching on a computer not count? You can’t even forward through the commercials on most sites. Why does DVR not count? Even if you are forwarding through the ads you still see them on your screen. Redesign the ads to show the product for longer so that if a consumer is forwarding the product name will show on the screen. It’s time for TV, Nielsen, and the Netowrks to come into the 21st century.

April 19, 2011 6:12 am

I agree with Vicki she didn’t want to burn any bridges in her industry. All her stated things they did were done in a totally half-a**ed way. No one wants CGI, bringing back former members of the cast only works if you give them a proper s/l–stunt casting how dumb was that experiment on GH.
All that was needed was a decent s/l that used the talents of the ppl already on canvas. OLTL was and is doing a great job doing that exact thing. GH was doing the complete opposite and AMC just seems to have lost it’s way in the last yr but has many great characters.
So I call BS on this person’s statement

Nanci akemon
April 19, 2011 8:55 am

I guess 5 million viewers do not matter to them! Boycott ABC & their sponsors!

April 19, 2011 9:05 am
Reply to  Nanci akemon

You seriously wonder!……..

April 19, 2011 10:24 am
Reply to  Nanci akemon

I hope it’s 5 million and rising………..maybe some VIP’s with money to burn will start their own network or buy one taking on the 2 Soaps.

April 19, 2011 9:08 am


Look at OLTL, they proved it. Their storylines have been rocking lately and have been praised for it, accordingly. Their ratings have increased in recent months.

The thing about soap viewers is that we really are not high maintenance viewers. We don’t need movie stars like James Franco. We do not need plot points. We don’t need fancy sets or HD. We don’t need younger actors to be shoved down our throats.

All we need is for our favorite characters to be on our screens and the ability to understand and follow the storylines being played out on our screens.

What extensive research was done?
Focus groups – from people who do not even watch soap operas, who have no history of the show and/or its characters.
Did they ask the fans of the show? And if they did ask, did they listen?
I was at ABC Insider for quite some time and everything that was discussed there never showed up on our screens.
The result – as long as the research findings mirrored the Fronsvision, then it was accepted. Any findings that did not, were disregarded.

April 19, 2011 9:13 am

“How Not To Wreck A Show” by Douglas Marlard.
* Watch the show.
* Learn the history of the show. You would be surprised at the ideas that you can get from the back story of your characters.
* Read the fan mail. The very characters that are not thrilling to you may be the audience’s favorites.
* Be objective. When I came in to ATWT, the first thing I said was, what is pleasing the audience? You have to put your own personal likes and dislikes aside and develop the characters that the audience wants to see.
* Talk to everyone; writers and actors especially. There may be something in a
character’s history that will work beautifully for you, and who would know better than the actor who has been playing the role?
* Don’t change a core character. You can certainly give them edges they didn’t have before, or give them a logical reason to change their behavior. But when the audience says, “He would never do that,” then you have failed.
* Build new characters slowly. Everyone knows that it takes six months to a
year for an audience to care about a new character. Tie them in to existing characters. Don’t shove them down the viewers’ throats.
* If you feel staff changes are in order, look within the organization first. P&G [Procter & Gamble] does a lot of promoting from within. Almost all of our producers worked their way up from staff positions, and that means they know the show.
* Don’t fire anyone for six months. I feel very deeply that you should look at the show’s canvas before you do anything.
* Good soap opera is good storytelling. It’s very simple.

Douglas Marland is considered by many as one of the greatest head writers ever.
Marland was a former head writer ofAs The World Turns, Guiding Light, and General Hospital. He worked as a writer on Another World and co-created Loving.
He won multiple Emmy awards and Soap Opera Digest awards. Marland, a
former actor, loved daytime. He passed away on March 6, 1993.

This article was published in the April 27, 1993 issue of Soap Opera Digest.

April 19, 2011 9:19 am

Sorry, but all the stuff they she said the did, they botched. Bringing back legacy characters is the #1 botch, IMO. They brought back AE as Tina and it was AWFUL, they didn’t use her properly. Same can be said for all Cramers, the Gannons, and probably many others I can’t think of off the top of my head. I was thrilled that RJ and Hank were coming back, but they were back for one or two day, and RJ never saw Rachel or Hank, what!? They can’t just bring these fans favorites back for a few days and expect magic.
Truthfully I felt for YEARS that Brian Frons was purposefully trying to sabotage soaps, not help them. ABC needs to respect their fans, and IMO all she is doing is sucking up and trying not to burn bridges.
In the past six months OLTL has been doing much better overall. It still need improving, but what a difference compared to last summer. They are using their stronger actors more, using the vets, using the legacy characters, using history, and the show has improved, I actually watch almost every episode now, last summer, I think I watched once every two weeks.

April 19, 2011 9:20 am

The second paragraph offends me. Obviously, we can’t go back in time, but there are realistic things that the execs could have done, and Sara Saedi should be able to list at least some things she would have done differently to better promote the ABC soaps.

For example, she could have mentioned the lack of primetime advertising for soaps. Soap viewers watch dozens of ads for primetime programming each day, but there are no ads for soaps during primetime.

April 19, 2011 10:12 am

Talk about a cold piece of PR propaganda……; no feeling. Programming out mind want work. So, the VIP’s have tried everything…..; at least make it real. The rating boxes break up your equipment and other methods used for ratings should have gone out with the age of the dinosaur. Isn’t this the 21st century, or am I mistaken? Oh, and another thing, were the sick and and the disabled market even given a chance to be counted for viewing or even listening to the SOAPS everyday for those who could not see? What we need is subscriber Internet TV for our SOAPS. So it was implied that SOAPS have gone out; I don’t think so; not just yet, but the antiquated way of judgment and tabulation has in this fast moving time we are living in. Thousands of SOAP Fans use to attend Super Soap World; spending mega bucks on hotels, transportation, food and entertainment within the park; that event was stopped too. Walt Disney was about the dream and the dream has been killed a few years to early in a recognizable covert way. “Yes” with this comment, I’ll be added to your list history and thank you for taking the time to read this. America is all about being able to express one’s views on a subject that hits the heart, and right now, it’s ‘my soaps’.

April 19, 2011 10:13 am

Soaps aren’t as tight as they used to be, really the narrative isn’t consistently as good. The actors are phenomenal, but I think they needed some new creative teams, or to shake them up or give them more time to write. I watch GH the most or used to, and there are HUGE holes in it, the whole cast isn’t being used effectively, the stories are more repetitive than they need to be, I know thats a part of soaps but they go above and beyond. They have horrible timing issues – stories moving too fast (bus crash, jakes death) or too slow (brenda, the balkan) but not usually just right, romances are something they just can not get at a good angsty interesting place — and thats the show thats not canned right now. I watch OLTL and am supporting it but I haven’t watched it consistently enough for years to pick at it, but GH and the other soaps are fixable – they don’t need stunts they need interesting addictive stories — and we need a better rating systems, not counting DVR’s and all that is silly.

Also we ABC needs to look at other shows, look at the integrated family stuff at Y&R, and also look overseas, soaps thrive in other countries. The UK has some great stuff, borrow from primetime shows. They just need to up the quality not throw gimmicks at us.

April 19, 2011 12:19 pm

There are more people that watch soaps than is being counted and they know that. The truth is they are looking for cheaper shows to put on thier networks, its all about the money to heck with the fact that people watched this with thier mother and the shows go from one generation to another. Advetisers have sold thier products with the loyalty of the daytime soap viewership now they should band together and follow hoover and say this is history you just don’t throw something historic out because its harder you fight and make it stronger after all this America its what we are built on, so I say other advertisers should join hoover and show thier loyal customers you have supported us all these years and now we will support you.

April 19, 2011 1:48 pm

The writing is a huge problem and the fans have been writing to TPTB for YEARS and have gotten no where. Now, if they had just looked at fan mail, emails and listened to comments left on comment lines, perhaps things would be different..

I believe they survey themselves and that’s all they care about.

I will never watch ABC again once all the soaps are gone.

April 19, 2011 2:06 pm

Well, we cannot argue that the numbers for supporting daytime soaps have diminished significantly over the past few years. Even in recent attempts to save the soaps, where are the numbers? A few thousand voices will not be enough to change all the advertisers or even a significant number of them to make a real impact on ABC. While I respect the fervor and rage about the cancellation of AMC and OLTL, ABC is not going to reverse its decisions. Sponsors are not going to pull out in droves. GH will be next soap to die and very, very soon. We can spin the wheels and send out letters and burn up phone lines, but unless the legion of fans is in the millions who will turn up the heat, it is a lost cause.

The world is moving on past daytime soaps ala ABC style. The writing on AMC and OLTL was awesome and amazing more times than not. The writing for GH has lacked any real substance for a very long time. Current storylines are not progressive. Where is the diversity on GH? Blacks and Hispanics have not been represented adequately for a long time. Forget a gay/lesbian storyline. GH drops the ball on those kinds of stories. They are too afraid to even progress an interracial storyline of late for fear of viewer backlash? Why the hell would I want to support its continuation if it cannot even put forth the effort to advance diverse characters that look like the modern demographics. If this is the audience that they are catering to, then GH needs to go the way of the guillotine as well.

Frons may be Lucifer incarnate, but they were some powers above him that made these close door decisions long ago. Frons if the cover band for the real Death Squad ABC. We may not like Ms. Saedi’s remarks, but the truth served warm rarely satisfies the palate of those who are hungry for a different fare.

April 23, 2011 10:02 am
Reply to  Dale

That you, Saedi?

Brian Greene
April 19, 2011 2:10 pm

Sara Saedi is full of b***s***! She’s kissing Brian Frons’s a** big time!

April 19, 2011 2:43 pm

Get with the times people – soaps are dead and I assure you, like any industry, feedback is always evaluated considered and implemented. This is cyclical and not new news: most game shows died, video killed the radio star, reality tv killed the video star, itunes killed the music stores, amazon will soon kill bookstores. Yes, you should absolutely mourn the loss, but don’t shoot the messenger.

April 23, 2011 10:03 am
Reply to  slim


April 19, 2011 3:27 pm

I think this is just excuses. I watched soaps since I was a child with my grandmother and mother. I’ve stopped watching soaps consistently not because I was busy working on getting a degree, working full time or raising children. I stopped because of the poor writing plot line wise and character wise. I stopped because of the couples they continually put together were lacking. I stopped because the female characters were constantly being portrayed as mindless objects just there as props for the male characters. I stopped because only a few actors were used over and over again day after day while others were missed if you dared blink and eye. I stopped because history was ignored and veteran characters were ignored or killed off. ABC did nothing to stop the decline of it’s daytime programming. If it had I would be tuning in, granted I would have to record it on my DVR and watch it when I got home but I would be watching. Daytime dramas are not the problem. These shows have been around for decades and have an audience that grew up watching them and passed it down as a right of passage if you will. Teenagers do watch shows with their parents. I should know I have three. Those in charge are the problem. They refused to listen to the outcry of their viewers, decided they knew best and in the end ran off millions.

April 19, 2011 3:47 pm

I agree with what is said here. ABC did NOT do enough to keep these shows on. It is more cost effective for them to put on talk shows and reality shows. JUST BE TRUTHFUL! Quit kissing up to Frons and trying to make him feel good lady. OLTL had a million characters and they had a hard time writing for them. Hell, the writer was not good at all. Why not scale back the casts of these shows and get head writers who are talented and bring back the formula that made us fall in love. Yes, it’s true that the demos have gotten smaller but the audience is still there. I think this is a smack in the face.

April 19, 2011 8:48 pm

Why doesn’t she talk about how ABC allowed Charles Pratt Jr., to literally write AMC into the ground for about two years, only to replace him with two more hacks that continued to write the show further in the ground. Let’s talk about killing off characters like Dixie & Stuart….two of your most beloved characters on the show….only to spend endless amounts of time propping up two characters that the fans don’t relate to and aren’t really that fond of. Let’s talk about how there has been a complete loss of what AMC used to be about….love, friendships, family, social issues. Where were those storylines? Guess I missed them.

I don’t believe for one second that Brian Frons has been getting a bad wrap. He did what he wanted to do, with total disregard to all of the soap fans of ABC. Cause no one can give me a good reasoning as to why OLTL is being cancelled. It has been the “One Show” among all of the other soaps, in my opinion, that has kept me glued to the tv everyday. And I agree with another poster said before…maybe the networks should have devised a system to account for all of the fans that DVR their programs….cause there are a lot of us working individuals that record their soaps everyday. It’s the first thing I do, before I head out the door for work…set my DVR for OLTL. Something tells me, if someone did their research, they would find a lot of people record their shows so they can watch them when they get home.

These networks get on my nerves with this demographic crap. I am a 32yo african-american man that loves to watch OLTL…and I have been watching for years and years….but I tell you this. Whatever you even think about putting in my soaps place, I will not be watching. So get ready for the hopes and dreams of this new programming schedule you have in mind to go right down the toilet.

Loretta Jamar
April 19, 2011 9:02 pm

I think there is a lot of truth to this, but instead of cutting the shows; they should have stepped out just a little more to find out who the fans are and how they feel; cut wardrobe, cut HD, don’t bring in the big time actors, just tell the story. I don’t know all the numbers, so I don’t know HOW bad the situation is, but there must have been a way to move the time slot and bring in some top notch research groups and creative groups to save the show. I still think the towel was thrown in too quickly

Rosie Peat
April 19, 2011 10:29 pm
Reply to  Loretta Jamar

I agree to a point. There’s definitely truth to the fact that there’s more competition for all shows and that viewing habits have changed and Nielsen’s haven’t kept pace, which has directly affected ratings for all shows. However, the statements about how Disney basically did everything they could and what more could we possibly want from them are complete and total bunk. They did exactly what you said in terms of official message boards, setting up Facebook pages and soliciting feedback there, the Insider’s Access focus group, and other focus groups as well. The problem is that they ignored the feedback they didn’t want to hear, went with the feedback that supported their opinions and already decided upon directions for the shows and characters, and then came back and blamed fans for low ratings. Inadvertently, fans were tellling them exactly how to cancel the shows by kvetching and providing constructive criticism and often at Disney’s request.

I hope more companies decided to pull a Hoover and that ABC prime time ratings continue to be down through May sweeps. Perhaps that will catch the attention of those above Sweeney and Frons. We’re lucky, in a sense, regarding the timing of this because decisions have already been made regarding shows returning to the fall line up for the most part. We can’t really hurt those shows’ chances for renewal this late in the season by boycotting, but we can hurt Disney’s bottom line and make a statement, if enough people continue ot participate. DWTS was down 13% in ratings on Monday, Cougar Town 15%, Desperate Housewives about 7% with all the other Sunday shows showing declines in ratings too of about 5 – 8%. Boycotting the soaps, however, is nothing more than cutting off your nose to spite your face, and Castle has been very supportive of daytime soaps in many respects from season 1.

Part of the reason this is such an issue for people is not just because the shows were canceled because that’s the nature of the beast in Hollywood, but it’s the manner in which Disney treated its employees. Allowing the cast and crew to move to LA knowing the show was on the chopping block is awful. Sweeney wants all three soaps gone so she knew it was only a matter of time even if AMC had survied this first round.

April 19, 2011 9:14 pm

She is full of crap. And looking for future employment when this all ends. Period end of story.

Rosie Peat
April 19, 2011 10:16 pm
Reply to  Gimme

ding, ding, ding, exactly

April 20, 2011 8:39 am
Reply to  Gimme

you’re obviously not paying any attention. the writer is a former EX-ABC exec. if you would take the time to read the full blog you’d actually see she left the network for many of the same reasons fans have been frustrated. expert from blog:

The main reason I quit my job is I felt I had little impact as an executive. It was incredibly difficult to get the writers to make significant changes to story. And incredibly frustrating when the negative feedback from fans merely echoed our own concerns about storylines. A huge part of being a good network exec is maintaining a good relationship with the show’s writers, but I got tired of stroking egos at the expense of storytelling. And the writing team I worked with was still getting the best ratings on the line up. I’d love for you guys to send me your top ten fave stories on an ABC soap and I’ll tell you which were suggested by the network and which were pitched by the HW. You might be surprised by the results. At the end of the day, the HW came up with some fantastic ideas and some not so fantastic ideas– the same goes for the execs

April 23, 2011 10:05 am
Reply to  slim

That you again, Saedi? You are so transparent.

April 24, 2011 7:42 pm
Reply to  slim

I did read the entire article. And I am well aware of the concept… not burning bridges, are you?. I think it goes with out saying she is ensuring her future employment by supporting what Frons spews that they have done.
Personally, all the things she listed “they” did…. was lame & proves how out of touch TPTB are with the fans. We didnt ask for that endless list of STUFF. We begged for continuity, character driven stories, relying on history, stop block taping. That is nothing & wouldnt have cost the shows one extra dime… not even a penny. They ignored & continue to do so. Perhaps without even knowing it… she has been trained into the Frons mindset. I truly believe since 2008 Frons has been on a mission to kill these shows.

April 20, 2011 12:25 am

Warning – this is LONG. I have not aired my grievances yet so I am letting them out here. I have never once written to ABC daytime – the one instance where I saw it do good was the rehiring of Rebecca Herbst (my favorite soap actress of all time) but I was shocked and am not completely convinced it was not a publicity stunt (without her knowledge – tasteless and tactless either way). I am a rather pessimistic person, so while I am enraged by this news (even though I have never really watched OLTL or AMC) I just don’t think writing in to ABC in droves is going to accomplish anything. They have made up their minds and are sticking with it. (Shout out to Hoover though for pulling their ads! I hope more sponsors choose to do the same and the new shows premiere with abysmal viewership). I will, however, use this as a place to share my thoughts. I’m a GH viewer of almost 15 years now and if the 80s was the heyday I sadly missed it, but I recall being obsessed with the show in the 90s. After 2002? The show went downhill and I became an on again off again viewer. I stopped watching all together 2 years ago and tuned back in only to see Jake’s death. Here are my thoughts: 1) I believe that Brian Frons, his cohorts and supporters, have counted on and encouraged the decimation of soaps since the beginning of his tenure at the station. 2) I do not believe that the brass at ABC daytime ever listened to what the fans truly wanted to see. Brian Frons made up his own mind about every decision and even admitted to wanting to “train” the fans to like the characters, storylines and pairings he likes. Unsurprisingly, that obviously didn’t work. 3) Stunt casting will bring in viewers for a short time – but they are tuning in to watch the actor (James Franco for example) and will tune back out when he leaves. 4) Increased special effects are a waste of money. Seeing Jason flying toward Wyndemere on a boat in a storm was just ridiculous. If I want to see special effects I’ll go to the movies. This is not what anyone should expect from soaps. 5) Bringing back legacy characters is a good idea ONLY when they are brought back for a lengthy time with logically thought out story ideas and integration back into the cast. I am just sick at how long Genie Francis wanted to return and was denied being given more than a few weeks here and there just to have her character end up as a broom with a wig on it again and again. An actress of that caliber and history deserves better. ABC is out of their minds for not bringing her back – think of the fans who would tune back in to see her in a legitimate storyline! 6)… Read more »

Terry G.
April 20, 2011 7:12 am

Several things occurs to me as I read this and the comments…
1) she has some valid points but misses many –Soaps are a traditional generational effort. My nieces watch because I watch they are 13 and 15. I watched because my mom did and she because of her mom. That is still the case for many households I know- didn’t track the numbers well in my mind.
2) there seems to have been a huge misstep in the whole Latina telenovella argument…people watched those because they were dramatic television not a glorification of a few distinct characters. ABC consistently ignored it’s African American and Latino audiences. OLTL and AMC had minority actors who are contracted and till this day rarely used. It’s a joke. Fans would write and beg and spend lots of money to get them to pay attention to these extroadinarily young, talented individuals. Instead they were used to prop up their favorite caucasions with no story and absolutely no care or concern for creating a strong ensemble cast
3) many people are arguing their points using GH; the one show that is still going to remain on the air (although I doubt for very much longer)- here lies the problem, too much attention has been paid to GH and AMC and OLTL were micro Managed into the gorund.
4) SoapNet was never used to its potential. When it first came on we were all enthralled with shows like Soapopgraphy, the talks shows and the original programming that enhanced our soap viewer experience. Some idiot came along and decided that 10 episodes of this repeat and that old show were what we wanted to see…not so much ABC/Disney again micromanaged into the ground.
5) and Lastly, I will never forget the day that I read that Brian Frons quote that essentially said something like Soap Fans don’t know what they want they need us to tell them what they like…that was several years ago. I knew then the genre was on its way out because anytime some clown comes out and disrespects their audience that much then the audience was fighting a losing battle. I felt then as I do now that Frons was on a mission to destroy this genre.

I don’t believe he has done it alone, I do believe we fans with our crazy couple love and silly demands on the network have helped…I do believe that we have to take some of the pain here…I’ve said this many times, you can’t bash the shows, bash the actors, be ugly to people and make unreasonable demands and then be surprised when the shows come to an end. As a 40+ year watcher of ABC Daytime and one who has attended almost every event ABC has ever held in this COUNTRY, I am sad but realistic about the fact that this genre has come to an end and many have played a part in ending it.

April 20, 2011 2:07 pm

This thread is deliciously insane. Kudos to the soap fans here for spending their free time understanding the economic underpinnings of such a challenging format.

If every soap fan watched daytime TV every day for three hours it still would not amass enough eyeballs and time to make it a worthwhile venture in such a fractionalized world of media choice (and choices in general…careers, fitness, family… who has the time?).

The societal constructs of today just don’t jive with a TV concept from yesteryear…and too few people out there interested in the format to continue producing it. Creatively, you could give it an Aaron Sorkin writing team and a Michael Bay production budget and still not enough people would turn out to generate a reasonable financial return.

You hate on the networks but at the end of the day they like the status quo more than anyone! We’re not talking about a crazy new generation of innovators here. Imagine how much they must have been losing to see the writing on the wall and finally pull the plug.

April 20, 2011 10:48 pm
Reply to  Bry

Thank you for belittling the fans’ passion for this genre and our intelligence at the same time – and for insinuating that we don’t have lives.

I didn’t tune out because I was distracted by other media or because I work a demanding full time job and don’t sit at home all day. I tuned out because I was sick of sh*tty writing, decimation of history, disrespect of legacy characters and actors that I had grown to love, and too much time and energy focused on the same characters and repetitive, recycled story lines.

I can be on my computer at work all day, post on facebook repeatedly, write a blog entry, tweet, go to a 3D movie, come home at night and still tune into GH if I want to. I have the crazy ability to multi-task like that. I know, it’s weird!

I’m not saying there weren’t other factors or that there is only one person to blame, and I’m not going to speculate on the economy because I don’t feel that is something I can speak to. I’m not that naive. But the fans deserve way more respect than they’ve gotten over the past 10 years and they have every right to be hurt and angry.

The one thing they never tried was quality storytelling and listening to what their fans really wanted.

Terri W.
April 22, 2011 7:30 am
Reply to  Liz

Agreed!!! You are absolutely right, Liz!

April 28, 2011 12:22 pm
Reply to  Liz

Well put, Liz!

April 22, 2011 2:25 pm
Reply to  Bry

I co-sign your posting. Very well said. The crazies are coming out in droves. They are even starting to bash Oprah Winfrey who graciously declined her assistance in propping these shows on her network. Now they are acting like spoiled rotten children calling for her demise?

Ridiculous. Let’s get on with living our lives and spending time with our families. The era for episodic daily drama is over. Our own daily lives are dramatic enough. Don’t need to see poorly written crap every day.

Hoover pulled out…Yippee do rah. But let’s see how long the 5,500 fans that are blowing up facebook can keep Hoover’s sales up. It will not happen. I give another week and this will all blow over.

Maybe Tyler Perry will make a movie called Diary of Mad Soap Fan and donate the proceeds to the crews on the cancelled shows. The actors need to start auditioning or find a new craft. I was laid off twice in the past two years, and I managed to survive. You may have to cut back and live within your means, but you won’t die doing so either. I have no sympathy for the over-paid mediocre talent that is freaking out that their day jobs are going away when there are hundreds of thousands of educated Americans who can’t find quality mid pay jobs. My sympathy is for real America. Soaps be damned!

April 23, 2011 10:16 am
Reply to  Bry

Bry….why are you even posting here? Go away.

April 23, 2011 10:18 am
Reply to  Brooke

Dale, you too.

Terri W.
April 22, 2011 7:27 am

If ABC brought back “legacy characters”, it was only for the Sweeps periods to boost ratings. They would dangle these characters (that the fans had been clamoring for, but on a LONG term basis) in front of viewers and then the characters would be gone once the Sweeps period was over. That left MANY fans feeling USED. There has been NO better soap lately than OLTL! The writing, directing and performances have been brilliant, incorporating the history of the show and core, veteran actors alongside the newer, younger actors. The differences in the ratings between OLTL and GH, in my opinion, can only come down to the fact that GH is on in a later time slot, when many kids have gotten out of school. That’s why AMC and OLTL are watched on Hulu, You Tube, SoapNet, etc. But, those viewings do not count toward the overall ratings of each show. As for the remarks in the article stating that they can’t take women out of the workforce and make them watch daytime TV: then who is their “target audience” for these two new crap reality shows they want to slap on the airwaves? What a LAME EXCUSE! The shows aren’t exactly geared toward MALES. I am so tired of the blatant disrespect and disregard that we fans of the soaps have had to endure for YEARS. Frons is an IDIOT and the first cost-cutting measure should have been with his position and his paycheck! Here’s to the RESURGENCE of the soap genre!!! Everything old is NEW again!

April 22, 2011 12:29 pm

There was a protest against Brian Frons back in Oct. 2007, people wanted him fired then from ABC to save our soaps and Anne Sweeney was President then. Since Frons was behind the cancellation of the Soap *Search For Tomorrow* from CBS and NBC, he was probably hired at ABC to get all their soaps cancelled! Nothing was done to save the soaps, its all money money money, they don’t care about the viewers!

April 22, 2011 12:46 pm

Wow alot of people on here in denial about what is really going on here. Why is it every time someone says an ounce of truth regarding the dim outlook for soaps, people automatically call that person a crony for the “bigwigs”?

If one looks at the ratings for television in general, the ratings went down across the board. That is because of a cultural revolution. Its not just the fact that people have multiple ways to watch a show now, but now cable channels are making their own shows rather than just airing syndicated shows of the past and current. A show that 20 years ago would have gotten 40 million views, now gets less than 20 million, if they are lucky.

Denial about the sad state of affairs that soaps are in isn’t going to save what soaps are left. Instead of blaming Frons, Oprah, Rachel Ray, or anyone else that doesn’t cry in sorrow over AMC and so on, why not look for all of the factors that affect soaps? For starters, why not look at the actual writers themselves? Why not change the formula of soaps? In fact, that is a major problem right now, because soaps have kept with the old formula when the rest of television evolved, they became a dying breed, just like Blockbuster.

There is alot more to this than the actions of one man or one channel. ABC canceling 2 of its 3 soaps is part of a larger picture that goes well beyond Disney/ABC.

As long as people keep denying it, the soaps will continue to die off. In fact, with the way people are acting in their comments, I wouldn’t blame NBC and ABC for canceling their last soap and just get out of the soap business alltogether, what is the point in staying in something that not only are you not making much money in, but the audience wants to blame you for whenever things don’t go their way?

April 22, 2011 2:26 pm
Reply to  Maureen

Co-sign. Great post. I love it when rational and intelligent people comment.


Terri W.
April 23, 2011 6:57 am
Reply to  Maureen

Watching and loving the soaps does not make someone an IR-rational or UN-intelligent being anymore than someone NOT loving and watching soaps is automatically a level-headed genius. That’s the ridiculous stigma soap fans have had to endure for so long and we’re sick and tired of it. If you have not been a soap fan, then you would not KNOW that—FOR YEARS—we have been desperately attempting to get the soaps (and their networks) to tweak their formula—improve the writing to make it more realistic in order to bring it in line with today’s sensibilities. I’ve often commented on soap message boards that the viewers of today are not the same as in 1968 or even 1980 and lack of realistic stories were part of soaps’ problems. We are much more knowledgable about various aspects of police and medical processes and procedures and therefore, we will not just “suspend disbelief” when the stories become ludicrous. There are too many programs available on channels where they have the freedom to portray situations in a much more realistic light and while network TV soaps are always at the mercy of behind-the-times censors (ABC lives in a Disney-world after all), they still could use what they DO have that other shows lack, HISTORY, to bring the soaps up to speed. Many of us kept suggesting they listen to the fans and do whatever they could to get former fan favorites BACK on the shows to raise ratings. The people at these networks did not try to fix these problems. In fact, they continued doing the exact OPPOSITE of what fans were asking. Dropping veteran actors who were integral to the stories and were very much beloved by the viewers. In doing THAT, storylines that should have involved those important characters seemed less realistic and lost any real emotional impact. There is no other genre in television to compare to the soaps. With the exception of 60 Minutes, no other TV programs have run as long. These shows have become family traditions, passed down from one generation to the next. This is where fans’ passion comes into play. There is an emotional tie that you don’t find with other types of shows. The “reality” shows on TV today (you think fans of those shows are ROCKET SCIENTISTS???) are nothing more than disposable garbage. Like fast food, everything seems to be designed for easy-in, easy-out. But, there will ALWAYS be a desire for good story-telling. It’s in our nature, no matter how much the technological world would like to deny or downplay it. And to simply brush all of these fans off as being “irrational” and “unintelligent” demonstrates to me that YOU are the one who is IGNORANT and ARROGANT. Are you related to Brian Frons, by any chance? I see similar personality traits.

April 23, 2011 9:33 am
Reply to  Terri W.

I never said that so take a chill pill. Getting offended over every little remark whether real or imagined, isn’t helping the situation.

April 23, 2011 10:23 am
Reply to  Terri W.

Well said,Terri. I co-sign YOUR post!

Terri W.
April 23, 2011 12:58 pm
Reply to  Terri W.

@Maureen: No, thank you, I don’t believe I will take a “chill pill”. (Really? A “chill pill”??) I’m not offended, I’m simply fed up. You have every right to voice your opinion and guess what—so do I. You might want to consider, just for a second, that not ALL soap fans are “in denial”, nor are we out of touch with reality. Many of us have more knowledge of the TV industry and just how it operates than you realize. You want to make it appear that soap fans just want to lay the blame on everyone else while they turned a blind eye to the truth. There are a LOT of reasons for what is happening to the soaps and some of them ARE the fault of the management at these networks. The networks turn around and tell the fans, “well, you weren’t watching and we were losing money” and to that I say, “well, we were TELLING you why we weren’t watching and you did nothing ABOUT it”. It’s a two-way street.

And thank you, Brooke, for the vote of confidence.

April 23, 2011 2:09 pm
Reply to  Terri W.

Brook and Terry, if you want to save your soaps, stop blaming those who disagree with you. Keep on pushing away pragmatic realist thinkers who actually give sound advice as to how you can try and save your soaps. You guys do realize that ABC and other networks can’t afford to keep these airing these soaps as they are, right? If you want to save them, rather than force a network to go into bankruptcy to keep yourself happy for a few more months, why not actually propose realistic changes that these channels could make.

But in order to do that, you must stop blaming everyone who doesn’t say “save our soaps” or “it is your fault this is happening frons”. Blaming people WILL NOT save your soaps at all. It will only ENCOURAGE the networks to get out of the soap business.

You can keep on being abusive towards me and Dale and others who are trying to stay logical about the situation and totally divert the real source of problems for soaps, but in the end, Dale and I won’t suffer the side effects. It will be people like you, the diehard fans of soaps that will pay for not taking this situation seriously.

You can’t save your soaps by getting all emotional over it and trying to punish an entire network. This is about finances and unless you can present a financial plan that works, your soaps are going to keep dying. So stop asking for networks to go into bankruptcy and come up with a plan that these networks can implement. ABC is not going to take anyone serious if all they do is get on a computer and say “this is your fault Frons!!” and other illogical rants.

Barelia Sanders
April 23, 2011 4:48 pm
Reply to  Terri W.

Terry, so far you nor most of the people on here have not said anything other than blaming Frons and ABC. So for all intents and purposes, there is alot of denial going on. Instead of fighting me over this, why not use that energy to really find out why soaps are dying rather than blaming people for it and vilifying people.

Maureen is spot on in every way possible. Every rational person on this board is being ignored in favor of the preferred “its all ABC’s fault”. Come on, the blame game is old.

But you just keep on the path you and others are going on. In a few years time, the daytime soaps will be dead because no one wanted to take people like Maureen seriously.

None of you are suggesting actual solutions to the problem. None of you are looking at the big picture. None of you want to accept the real situation at hand.

Start giving some real constructive criticisms rather than usual blaming of anyone who dare has the courage to say something different.

Barelia Sanders
April 23, 2011 2:22 pm
Reply to  Maureen

I agree with you Maureen. I used to love General Hospital but fell out of favor with it a few years ago.

I have definitely noticed that alot of soap fans are doing nothing but yelling but saying nothing productive.

Those who blame Frons and company are just trying to take the easy way out. Those people do not care to save our soaps they just want to punish someone.

Boycotting ABC will not work. Soap viewership is only a fraction of ABC viewership altogether. Besides, I have noticed that the soap fans most upset by all this are the ones who don’t even watch that much primetime anyways. And those who are boycotting need to realize that it is not right to punish everyone else for the actions of a few. Your decision to do this, will not bring your shows back at all. Would you want to be blamed for the actions of someone else? No. So don’t do it to others.

But you are so very right that if people don’t start waking up to the real problems facing soaps, the remaining soaps will die. Haven’t people realized that it is just too easy to say its the fault of Frons? Can’t we get some common sense here? If Frons were the source of all problems facing soaps, then this would not be as big of a problem as it is.

I try to distance myself from the soap fans who go around blaming ABC for all this because they are not helping the cause, they are only making it worse. They aren’t doing one single thing to actually save our soaps, they are just trying to see to it that as you said, Maureen, the networks get out of the soap business altogether.

I am so ashamed and embarrassed that my fellow soap fans are letting themselves be fooled into thinking that that this is a simple problem created by Frons.

Behind every movement in society was someone who did not let their emotions get the best of them. They did not play the blame game. What they did is they went to a drawing board and strategically highlighted the problems and potential solutions.

Sure protesting gets you attention, but do you really think its going to make ABC listen? You’d have to be pretty naive to think that.

I just hope that my fellow soap fans will stop vilifying people like you, Oprah, and whomever else and realize that what you and they are saying has alot of truth to it, and rather than deny it, we try to work within in that.

Terri W.
April 24, 2011 7:46 am

If you actually read what I wrote, I wasn’t blaming those who disagree, I was stating that all the blame should not be leveled at the fans who HAVE tried to get through to the powers that be. The gist of my post was that there is PLENTY of blame to go around on BOTH sides. I watch both daytime and primetime shows. When I’m working, I DVR the daytime shows during their original airing. I know many people (in the coveted demographic, no less–woo hoo) who are not home to watch the daytime soaps and view them on SoapNet only. Well, they were surprised to find out that viewing or DVR/Tivo-ing these shows at any time other than their original airing or in a format (e.g. SoapNet, Hulu, You Tube) other than network TV does not even COUNT toward the ratings of that show. The way they collect ratings needs to be overhauled, as well. People do not watch television the way they used to in the past and it’s naive of the networks to think they can continue basing ratings (revenue) on an archaic (and highly fallible) formula. Another possible solution would have been to consider returning the soaps to a half hour format instead of canceling them outright. That would have cut costs to some degree. But, the FACT remains that the viewers have tried to reach TPTB at these networks, pleading with them to make changes to improve the shows, detailing the changes they would need to make to bring people back and all of this fell on deaf ears. It’s great to suggest constructive changes, but they don’t amount to anything if the people in a position to initiate these strategies are ignoring you. You can’t get through to people who already have their own agenda front and center and are more interested in promoting that. I’m not “vilifying” anyone, I simply believe that you are suggesting that soap fans are an unrealistic group of whiners who want to dump blame on everyone else and that isn’t the truth either. Brian Frons is being vilified not just for the decision to cancel those soaps, but for the WAY in which he has been going about it. If it’s too much for him to take, he should find another line of work. I also am aware that this problem with the daytime soaps stretches across the board to ALL the networks. After all, Another World, Passsions (which hadn’t been around very long, but had developed quite a cult following), Guiding Light and As The World Turns were the first to go and none of them were on ABC. Soap fans may be a “fraction” of the primetime viewing audience, but there are certainly enough of them to make a dent. And, as I said, there are more people watching than the networks realize, they just have not been watching in a counted format. Viewers’ protests and campaigns HAVE worked in the past to save beloved shows… Read more »

April 23, 2011 11:14 am

After reading that article and seeing that they were only worried about the 18 to 34 year old demographics, I say I don’t want to watch NBC. What am I, dead because I am 54? I spend my money the same as the 18 to 34 year olds. If it wasn’t for us baby boomers growing up watching the soaps, NBC wouldn’t be where they are today. But then again, didn’t Comcast purchase the NBC network? If so that speaks volumes. Comcast doesn’t know which way they are going. I really don’t think we need another talk show or game show, so what else is there to put in place of the soaps. Hope they go under for being idiots.

Terri W.
April 24, 2011 7:51 am
Reply to  Lexi

Another antiquated formula, Lexi, The “coveted demographics” of advertising, put in place in another day and age. 50 today is not the 50 of yesteryear. You don’t suddenly stop trying new things simply because you have a 50th birthday anymore than someone younger automatically spends like crazy on anything new. In fact, in this economy, I know more older people with plenty of disposable income than friends my age and younger. Money spends the same, no matter what age you happen to be.

Terri W.
April 23, 2011 1:05 pm

And just for the record, if soaps are simply to be written off as a “dying breed”, someone had better tell that to TNT. Their new version of Dallas, debuting this fall I believe, is very highly anticipated by fans of the old series and many younger people who have watched the old series and fallen in love with it. I would love to see it become wildly successful.

Barelia Sanders
April 23, 2011 4:43 pm
Reply to  Terri W.

Soaps aren’t a dying breed. Its daytime soaps that are a dying breed. How do I know? The fact that soaps are getting canceled but are not being replaced by another soap. Primetime dramas aka soaps are thriving well.

Terri W.
April 24, 2011 7:47 am

Well, there you go. You offered a solution for the daytime soaps.

April 24, 2011 10:28 pm

I think that her comments are ridiculous!!! I take offense to her snide remarks of the “things we did not do”….to ludicrous t0 repeat!!! Why in the world do they think that another talk show/self-help/reality show is needed ? I take offense to these comments that the “suits” make.

April 25, 2011 11:15 am

How does Sara Saedi know that children don’t watch the soaps with their mothers? She and Frons did not ask the public what they watch or like/not like!!! They all have their stupid heard up their asses!!!!!! Fire all of them!!!!!!!!

April 26, 2011 5:33 pm
Reply to  Charlotte

you’re crazy

April 25, 2011 4:17 pm

I don’t get why they have to cancel SoapNet, too. If they have a plan in place for another Disney kids channel, can’t they do like TVland or The N and have SoapNet at night? Then they can move all three ABC soaps to SoapNet and finish the night with classic episodes. They will increase their live viewership and keep the regular viewers happy. They can’t even use Passions as an excuse not to try it, because the established shows wouldn’t be alone (or the lowest rated soaps on TV).
Moreover, if it were a Disney teen network during the day, then they could help build the future audience because they’d be more inclined to continue to watch the shows airing in the evenings. Having cable subscriber helps offset any loss in advertising revenue, so there shouldn’t be any need for significant budget reductions. Soap audiences are on par with, if they don’t exceed, that of top much more expensive, non-subscription shows like Mad Men or The Shield or Breaking In. Plus, they might be more inclined to experiment with talented writers like GH: Night Shift’s Sri Rao, who would cost less than The Guza.

I don’t disagree with Sara Seadi’s argument that soap execs have tried a myriad of ways to attract viewers, but I don’t think that they’ve gone about their attempts in a coherent way. Taking the models that they’ve tried and consolidating them would make a lot more sense than completely eliminating a genre or system. She was completely right to say that daytime soaps are failing because our lifestyles have changed, but the culture itself hasn’t. In a world were there are dozens of networks based on showing reruns of shows still on the air (in particular that one that shows nothing but L&O, CSIs, and NCISs), I really cannot believe they cannot find a place within the ABC-Disney family to air new episodes of the 3 soaps.

April 26, 2011 5:22 am

When and where are the save the soap rallies? I have been waiting for breaking news of million soap fan marches in the streets. Did I miss it?

Oh, perhaps it’s because the numbers are not there. Or maybe because we have high unemployment and middle and lower class Americans are trying to maintain their livelihood rather than worry about a non-essential service like soap opera salvation. Towns are being blown away by tornadoes and violent storms. Food and gas prices are soaring. That’s the daytime drama most Americans are living.

April 26, 2011 5:34 pm
Reply to  Leona

amen sister.

Terri W.
April 27, 2011 8:56 am
Reply to  Leona

There are a number of rallies going on. Go to Facebook “Save AMC and OLTL”. Thousands have been flooding the offices of ABC and their advertisers with letters, e-mails, phone calls, etc, Word has it that ABC is feeling the heat, but Disney has yet to feel it, so now attention has turned to Disney. Hoover has pulled its ads from ABC and has launched its OWN campaign. E-Mail: Last I heard, L’Oreal and Hershey are also considering pulling advertising from ABC. Catherine Hickland (ex-Lindsay on OLTL) staged a protest with fans outside Disneyland. Whether or not any of this helps, at least they can say they tried and didn’t just stand by and do nothing.

As for the economic times we live in and acts of nature, that is when many people have turned to soaps as a way to escape, even if for a brief time. (And let’s consider that hundreds of people involved with AMC and OLTL will soon be out of work, as well.) Just because someone is trying to save a beloved show, does not mean they don’t ALSO speak up or protest on behalf of larger issues. I do.

April 26, 2011 5:19 pm

I say that when AMC was moved to California and oLTL was left alone to die-it came to life and started to climb in the ratings. Frons two babies that he paid all the attention to started to fall in the ratings… He was either to hands on or he worked his ass off to sabotage those shows so he could have reason to cancel.. why dont we fire frons and Sweeney then see how the soaps do after a year. I bet they take number one.
Frons does not like soaps… and he has proved that with the soaps cancelled when he worked on other net works… Money talks and bull shit walks…Disney will cover for him. Oprah and every one else will too… because they are part of a money chain where the rich take care of the rich. And the poor get no say… well wake up America… and smell the coffee.. and shame on everyone who says its over and dont fight… if a serial killer kidnapped u would you fight for you life giving yourself a chance or would you give up and die… I would hope the answer is fight… if NBC does pick up OLTL and keep it in NY with the same writers. and puts it on after or before Y&R it will be unstoppable…. and i would love to see the look on disney’s face… Boycott Disney take your kids to Six Flags – great adventure .. any place but Disney.. POOR WALTER DISNEY is turning in his grave…

All My Children

‘Strahan, Sara and Keke’ Canceled by ABC; Show Aired In Timeslot That Once Housed ‘All My Children’

No matter a network tries to do, replacing All My Children, which ran for 41 years on ABC has remained as everyone that follows the world of daytime drama knows, problematic.  Now come word via Page Six that Strahan, Sara and Keke has been canceled.

The show hosted by Michael Strahan, Sara Haines and Keke Palmer if you recall, replaced the foodie show, The Chew which ran for seven seasons and was the first show to air in the timeslot that belonged for over four decades to All My Children. 

Back in March of this year, Strahan, Sara and Keke took a break to make way for ABC’s News  Pandemic: What You Need to Know, a daily coronavirus report anchored by Amy Robach, Dr. Jen Ashton and sometimes TJ Holmes.

However, because the show did well in that two-week experimental run it morphed into GMA 3: What You Need to Know.  The new version of the show also talked about hot topics in the current news cycle, as well.

ABC’s Catherine McKenzie began producing the “GMA3” show four months ago and the network officially announced her as Executive Producer of the program on Thursday.

While ABC has yet to officially announce Strahan, Sara and Keke is over, a spokesperson told Page Six: “We’re proud of our teams at ‘SSK’ and ‘GMA3’ and how quickly they transitioned to producing a daily show to give people the news and information they need during an unprecedented pandemic, and conversations continue about how the show will evolve in the months ahead.”

It appears that Strahan, Sara and Keke won’t be returning; the future as many of their staff have transitioned over to ‘GMA 3’ with producers from ABC News Live, (the streaming division), helmed by McKenzie.

As for the futures of Strahan, Haines and Palmer; Strahan will continues to host Good Morning America, and they are all actively under contract with the network.

So, what do you think of  ‘Strahan, Sara and Kek’e being replaced by ‘GMA 3: What You  Need to Know’?  How long do you think that show will last in the timeslot once taken up by residents of Pine Valley? Comment below.

0 0 vote
Article Rating
Continue Reading

All My Children

Eva LaRue Talks On Her Daytime Emmy Nomination, And Opens Up About The Loss Of John Callahan

For Eva LaRue, the past two months have been some of the most emotionally gut-wrenching and challenging of her life, following the passing of her ex-husband, father of her child, and dearest friend, John Callahan (Ex-Edmund, All My Children). The outpouring of support she has received not only from her former AMC cast mates, but the soap world in general illustrates just how dear Eva is to all of us, and how many people had special memories of their time with John.

While mourning the loss of Callahan along with their daughter, Kaya, there was some heartwarming and re-affirming news that any actress would love to hear. Eva was nominated for a Daytime Emmy in the Outstanding Guest Performer in a Drama Series for her work as Celeste Rosales on CBS’ The Young and the Restless, and she is great company as her former AMC co-star Michael E. Knight (Ex-Tad) is also nominated along with her for his work on General Hospital.

The coronavirus pandemic has hit our country and world hard, but through it All My Children virtual reunions emerged as fans were engaged by the content, transported to happier times that brought them back to familiar faces in Pine Valley in which Eva participated along with her good friends, Kelly Ripa, Mark Consuelos and so many more, thanks to the EW. com weeklong event which concluded on Friday.

Michael Fairman TV talked with Eva in this very candid, at times heartbreaking, and open conversation where she shares details into the final days of her beloved John, her last moments with him, and how she tried to plan a memorial in his honor during the COVID-19 pandemic.

For so many of us, 2020 has certainly seen more lows then highs, but in the end for Eva, to receive a nomination now (an award she was last nominated for back in 1997 as Outstanding Supporting Actress in a Drama Series for her work as Dr Maria Santos on All My Children) couldn’t have come at a better time. Here now is our conversation with Eva.

Photo: JPI

I’ve been thinking so much about you.  I’m glad we could do this, and in the midst of the tragedy of losing John Callahan, and then receiving a Daytime Emmy nomination.  What was your reaction when you learned you were nominated in a category with none other than your former AMC castmate and good friend, Michael E. Knight (Ex-Tad, AMC, now Martin, GH)?

EVA:  Oh, I know!  He’s the first person I texted!  I was like, “Congratulations, Michael!  Did you ever in a million years think that you and I would be in the same category of anything?”  Then I said, “And when you win this, can I just borrow it for the weekend just to dress it up and take pictures with it… just want to borrow it, just babysit the trophy for a weekend, please?” (Laughs)

Photo: JPI

What did you end up submitting that landed you the nomination for your role as Celeste on Y&R?

EVA: I submitted a scene with Peter Bergman (Jack, Y&R), who I have been friends for 30 years, if not more, and in all that time we had never worked together.  I met him when I was married to John O’Hurley (Ex- Dr. James Grainger) because John was over at The Young and the Restless at the time.  I went to a Christmas party with John to Peter and Mariellen’s house, and do you know who else was there?  Lisa Rinna (Ex-Billie, Days), and it was before she had gotten Days of Our Lives. She was dating Peter Barton (Ex-Scott Grainger, Y&R) at the time. We both ended up on soaps at the same time.  So, I submitted a scene with Peter, who is amazing, warm and open and such a great actor. Then I submitted a scene with my on-screen daughter Sasha Calle (Lola, Y&R) – I love that girl, and another one with Michelle Stafford (Phyllis, Y&R) who has also been my great friend for a couple of decades. The other scene I put on my reel was with me and Jordi Vilasuso (Rey, Y&R) who I also adore.  He is awesome and such a sweetheart.  I only had two months worth of material to draw upon.  So, I just submitted the scenes that I liked the best, and they all were within story, and all made sense.

Photo: Getty Images

Where is Celeste supposed to be now?

EVA:  She went back to Florida, and that was that. I would never say never to anything, but it was always supposed to be a short stint, and it was great.

So not only is it you and Michael E. Knight, but Jeffery Vincent Parise, Chrishell Stause, and Elissa Kapneck. This Guest Performer category is loaded!

EVA:  I know! I know and love, Chrishell (Ex-Amanda) because we worked together on All My Children, too, right before I left, and she is a doll.  She just might be the sweetest, kindest, girl on the planet.  She literally might be the sweetest person who ever lived!  I don’t know the other two nominees personally.  So, I’m excited for them too.  It’s such a diverse category.  It’s just really fun to be nominated with all of them.

Photo: Hallmark Channel

You were nominated before, though, for your work as Maria on All My Chldren during the emotional baby switch storyline; working opposite Susan Lucci (Ex-Erica) for a lot in it.

EVA:  Yes.  I was nominated for Best Supporting Actress for All My Children, and I was nominated for Best Original Song.  I wrote a song when Maria came ‘back from the dead’ to All My Children, with a producer friend of mine from Miami Sound Machine.

Photo: Live with Kelly Ryan

So, you’ve been doing all of these All My Children virtual reunions, which is so interesting that in this pandemic, people are looking for content, and they dip back into these beloved shows.  Was it fun doing the Santos Family reunion with everybody?

EVA:  Oh yeah, it was really, really fun.  I only saw in the big picture everybody else’s photo who was a part of it, and the people who I actually do hang out with the most, and see the most, and talk to the most, are Kelly Ripa (Ex-Hayley), Mark Consuelos (Ex-Mateo), and Sydney Penny (Ex-Julia).  I don’t see Sydney as much, but I do see her probably once every two years at least, but Sarah Michelle Geller (ExKendall) I see all the time and talk to all the time.  Kelly, Mark, and Sarah are the ones who walked me through that first week when John Callahan passed.  They literally were on the phone with me, the three of them, almost every day, but I got beautiful outreach, from what seemed like everyone.  This is when no matter how many years have passed since you have been in daytime, that the daytime family as a group – there used to be fifteen shows, now there are four – and people have bounced around and they are on other shows- – but the entire soap opera community reached out,   I cannot even tell you how much that meant to me.  It was overwhelming, and it was really, spectacularly beautiful.

Photo: JPI

I hope it was some solace to you knowing how much people loved John, and also that they love and care so deeply for you.

EVA:  I mean, people who did not even work with John reached out.  Every soap was represented by getting a hold of me, sending a text or a phone call, or if they didn’t have my personal information, they tweeted, or whatever it was… literally from every reach of soapdom.  It was amazing.

And your relationship with John was amazing with all of the ups and downs you went through; that you remained such dear friends.

EVA:  We remained really great friends all the way.

Photo: JPI

I so remember when the two of you first got together and it was this storybook real life soap couple romance.  John was always so sweet to me.  I was so, so sad, and you know, my heart just broke for you.

EVA:  I think it was just such a shock.  I don’t think anybody, and even Kaya were talking about it, because she graduated this week, and her dad is not here.  We’re not having a graduation, because of COVID-19, which sucks on top of it, but we were just kind of talking through the feelings of it.  She said, “You know what’s weird?  I guess I never pictured dad getting old, and I always wondered why, and now I know.”  When I would get on John about his heart or his health, he used to always say, ‘Oh, don’t worry Evala, (he always called me “Evala”).  I’m going to be here.  I’m going to be here a long time.  I’m fine.  I’m going to be here to walk Kaya down the aisle and see her kids and all that.  Stop worrying,” Every time he said it to me, something in my gut said, “I don’t think he is.  I don’t think he is,” but I always just dismissed that.  But never in my wildest dreams did I think John wouldn’t make it to her high school graduation.  He was only 66.

Photo: JPI

I had heard you ended up running to Palm Springs to be near John.  I can’t even imagine what that must have been like.

EVA:  The only good thing about this pandemic is that we had been shut down for only two weeks at that point.  Kaya and I got in the car.  John had some heart procedures the day before, on a Thursday.  I called him in the morning before he went in for the procedure.  I said, “Call me as soon as you get out of there.  Call me as soon as you come-to again, and you’re good,” and he said, “Okay, I will.”  I said, “I’m going to send Kaya out to you on Friday for the weekend, just so you have somebody to hang out and watch you, and I might come out too,” And then, I said, “Maybe, I’ll come down too in case you are feeling weak, just to watch out for you for the weekend.”   So, he called me after the procedure.   I said, “I cannot believe they sent you home! You just had some major heart stuff done.”  He said, “Oh no, they said I’m fine.  It was just run-of-the-mill heart stuff, angiogram…”  I was like, “Are you sure?”  He said, “Yeah, I’m fine.  I’m just tired.  I’m going to go to sleep.”  I said, “Do you want me to send Kaya out tonight?” and he was like, “No, no, no.  Send her tomorrow.”  So, in the morning, I called him at 9:00am.  No answer.  I texted him.  He always texted me like Johnny on the spot, and then texts me immediately back.  So, I call him again at 10.  Nothing.  His best friend calls me about a half-hour later, “Hey, I talked to John at about 8:00 this morning.  He said he was feeling really, really shitty and was going to go back to the hospital, and then, I texted him again at like 8:30 to just tell him something, and he hasn’t texted me back, and he always texts me immediately back.”  I said, “Oh my, God, I’ve been trying to get a hold of him for two hours; he hasn’t texted me back,”   I said, “You know what, I’ll call you back.”  So, I called his friend who lives down the street from John, and I said, “Go to his house, please right this second, knock on the door, jump the fence, knock on his bedroom, he might be asleep, I don’t know.”  So, he gets there, nobody is answering.  I said, “Break into the house please.  So, he did, and John was collapsed in the bathroom.  They called the paramedics, and as soon as they called me back and said, “John is unresponsive in the bathroom,” Kaya and I threw everything in the car, and what usually takes us two and a half hours without traffic, we made it down there from Los Angeles in an hour and forty-five minutes.

Photo: JPI

I don’t know how you made it down there in one piece. Thank, God!

EVA:  I drove so fast, like literally broke all land speed records and thank God because we got there just in time.  He was in emergency.  He hadn’t been put up in ICU yet, where we wouldn’t have been able to see him.  They weren’t going to let us in the hospital.  Thank God the person answering the door was an All My Children fan.  She was the one saying, “Sorry, no one is allowed in the hospital, no one can come in,” and I was like, “No, no, no, my ex-husband just came in.”  She said, “Was it Edmund?” and I said, “Yes, it was Edmund!”  She said, “Okay, follow me.”  Thank God for All My Children.  Thank God.  So, we followed this woman secretly, and we get to spend a half-hour with him in Emergency.  He was already on life-support, totally unresponsive, but we got to play John his favorite music, we got to just sit there and hold his hand and talk to him, and tell him how much we loved him.  Sarah Michelle Gellar called right when we were in the hospital in Emergency, and she said, “Put the phone by his ear,” so I put the phone by his ear, and she talked to John too, and she told him how much she loved him.  She used to always call him “GP”, which was short of grandpa, because she came on the show when she was 15, and she didn’t have a dad, and John acted like a dad to her – but she used to always call him “grandpa”, and he hated “grandpa”, so he was like, “You can call me “GP”, but not grandpa,” so she always called him GP.  I just put the phone by John’s ear, and what was crazy is that when she talked to him, his feet started twitching.  He started moving his feet.  Then, when Kaya was talking to him about Yankee season, he started moving his feet.  We were kind of hopeful that something was changing for the better.  We had about a half-hour with him, and then, they took him up to ICU, and then, we knew we couldn’t see him again.  They called us later that night that he had passed.

Photo: JPI

I am just so thankful that you got to see John one last time.

EVA:  I thank God every day that we got to say goodbye, because if we hadn’t gotten there in time to say goodbye, I just don’t know.

It’s very rare that a couple after a divorce, who have a child, and went from romance to dear friends, end up maintaining that relationship so many years later in their lives.  I know so many people who were together at one point in their lives, for years, and they don’t even talk to each other now.

EVA:  Well, you know, like any divorce, the first four years afterwards were super contentious but then, by year five, we kind of had this major breakthrough, and from then on, he was one of my closest friends, and one of the things we always kept alive for each other was we loved to  dance together. We fell in love, I think, dancing because originally our characters on AMC met at this country-western bar, and we had to take country line dancing lessons on the show.  They hired a choreographer for us so that during those scenes where we were falling in love, we would actually be able to do a two-step! So, we went out and practiced at Denim and Diamonds, which was a big country-western place in New York City at the time.  We used to go out with a whole group of us.  It was me, and Teresa Blake (Ex-Gloria) and Kelly Ripa, and her boyfriend at the time, Winsor Harmon (Ex-Del), sometimes Walt Willey (Ex-Jack); we just had a whole crew of us who would go out country dancing.  John and I also loved singing together.  He had the most amazing gravely kind of rockstar voice, but his real talent was harmonizing.  He could harmonize to anything.  So, when he would come over, we would sit in the kitchen and sing, and sing, and sing until the late hours because that’s what we loved to do, and that’s what he loved to do.  That’s one of my favorite last memories of us.  He was just over the month before, and Kaya’s bedroom is near the kitchen, so she came out and was like, “Can you two shut up?”  It was like two in the morning and we were still singing in the kitchen. (Laughs)  John was my dear friend and my confidant.

Photo: ABC

Were you able to have some kind of service during this stay-at-home pandemic we are all dealing with, in order to mourn the loss of John?

EVA:  It’s been so crazy.  We couldn’t even have a funeral.  That’s what made it all the more heartbreaking.  There were less than twenty of us, and we just got on a Zoom call and memorialized John.   I thought we were going to do a big Zoom memorial, but it seemed so overwhelming and so impersonal, it just was rubbing us wrong in every way.  Every way we were looking at it, we were like, “Oh my, God, we just can’t.”  We wanted to invite everybody he had ever worked with, and we were like, “No, we want to do that when everything can open back up again, and invite every person, and have a party” because John was always the life of every party.  Maybe we can do that in the fall or next year.  I kept trying to write something for the small memorial we did do for three days.  I kept coming back to this one song, because John was always the consummate bartender, too.  I sang a song that Bette Midler sang on the very last episode of Johnny Carson.  It was “One for My Baby (and One More for the Road)” and it’s about a bartender who has got a big personality and a lot to say.   I changed some of the words around a bit just to reflect who John was, and so, I ended up singing for it instead of speaking.  We always talked about that last episode of Carson; how stunningly emotional it was when Bette sang that song to kind of sing Johnny off for of all of his years on the air.  So, that’s what I did and because we loved to sing together, it just made sense.

Photo: HutchinsPhoto

I do think you touched upon something, earlier, too.  I don’t think any other genre would have that kind of unbridled camaraderie.  It’s such a family, like you said.  I don’t think you would find that quite like this; certainly in show business. 

EVA:  I really don’t think you can. Even though there is always a good amount of competition in the soaps as well; between the soaps it’s like they are any sports team, but there is always a level of respect, love, and familial connection within the community.  I think that is why they have stood the test of time.  I really do think that is what hooks our audience, that is what keeps them there after all of these years, even though unfortunately the genre is antiquated looking, there is something about it that is nostalgic, familial, and comfortable for people.

Photo: JPI

Every time I talk about All My Children, why do you think everybody go ga-ga for it, when it’s been off the air for several years now?

EVA:  It speaks to people’s childhoods.  It speaks to how we grew up.  You can’t undo nostalgia.  You can’t.  It’s in the way we grew up, the things we loved, the things that we scheduled our lives around, the people we fell in love with on the shows that we watched, who we cared about and loved their storylines. I grew up watching All My Children, General Hospital, and Days of Our Lives.

It must have been a spectacular moment for you when you realized you were actually in Pine Valley and a member of the cast of All My Children then?

EVA:  It was amazing.  I was a fan when I got the show.  I was a straight up fan.  I fangirled walking through that dressing room hallway for the first time! I was trying to keep it in check, but you know … (Laughs)

Photo: JPI

So, in closing, you would say, “Thrilled to be nominated”?

EVA:  Yes.  So fun.  It has really been a rollercoaster of a couple of months here.  That nomination was literally the bright, shining spot in all of this.

So, happy to hear Eva is in the running for a Daytime Emmy? Were you moved by Eva’s sentiments she shared on her relationship with the late John Callahan? Do you miss Pine Valley’s Dr. Maria Santos? Share your thoughts in the comment section below.

0 0 vote
Article Rating
Continue Reading

All My Children

All My Children Reunion with Josh Duhamel, Ricky Paull Goldin, Cameron Mathison and More; Later Debbi Morgan Live

It’s a big finale of the weeklong virtual celebration of the iconic All My Children.  On tap today in EW’s series to benefit Feeding America during the COVID-19, some major names from the history of Pine Valley and who had story with each other participating in the chat, premiering at 10 a. m. EST.

Taking part in the walk down memory lane are none other than Josh Duhamel (Ex-Leo), Ricky Paull Goldin (Ex-Jake), Chrishell Stause (Ex-Amanda), Cameron Mathison (Ex-Ryan), Rebecca Budig (Ex-Greenelee) and Melissa Claire Egan (Ex-Annie).

But that’s not all folks! Daytime Emmy winner, Debbi Morgan will participate in a live virtual chat with today beginning at 3 p.m. EST/12 p. m. PST.  Now will be your chance to hear from the one and only Angie Hubbard from the beloved ABC daytime drama series.

Over the week, has posted other virtual conversations with notables from Pine Valley, you can check them out here.

So, will you be checking out today’s one-two punch of AMC favorites? Comment below.

0 0 vote
Article Rating
Continue Reading

Video du Jour

B&B’s Heather Tom talks with Michael Fairman immediately following her record-tying win in the Lead Actress category during the 47th annual Daytime Emmy Awards.  Heather and Erika now hold the most wins for an actress with 6! Leave A Comment

The Michael Channel

Recent Comments


Power Performance

Steve Burton as Jason & Maurice Benard as Sonny

General Hospital

Airdate: 5-19/20-2020



Would love your thoughts, please comment.x